 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
Friday, November 09, 2007
Golden Compass: Atheism for Kids?

Another movie. Another bout of anti-Christianity. Another chorus of anti-anti-Christianity protests. This time it's the Golden Compass and this link on the movie has been circulating all over the ether. Extracts below :
The movie has been described as "atheism for kids" and is based on the first book of a trilogy entitled "His Dark Materials" that was written by Phillip Pullman. Pullman is a militant atheist and secular humanist who despises C.S. Lewis and the "Chronicles of Narnia". His motivation for writing this trilogy was specifically to counteract Lewis' symbolisms of Christ that are portrayed in the Narnia series.
Clearly, Pullman's main objective is to bash Christianity and promote atheism. Pullman left little doubt about his intentions when he said in a 2003 interview that "my books are about killing God." He has even stated that he wants to "kill God in the minds of children". It has been said of Pullman that he is "the writer the atheists would be praying for, if atheists prayed."
While the movie itself may seem mild and innocent, the books are a much different story. In the trilogy, a young streetwise girl becomes enmeshed in an epic struggle to ultimately defeat the oppressive forces of a senile God. Another character, an ex-nun, describes Christianity as "a very powerful and convincing mistake." In the final book, characters representing Adam and Eve eventually kill God, who at times is called YAHWEH. Each book in the trilogy gets progressively worse regarding Pullman's hatred of Jesus Christ.
Here are some thoughts from a few friends which are worth pondering:
"Of course I will not let my kids watch it - not because it's "evil" but just as part of a parent's responsibility to screen through what our kids should not be seeing at their tender age where their minds are yet to be prepared for such confusion and contradictory materials. Getting paranoid is never a good thing - just basic parental common sense.
"One of my favorite past times when I was a teenager was to readyand critique cultic doctrinal materials - but before I could do that I had to have spent hundred of hours studying and understanding our own fundamental Christian doctrines.
"There must be a balance - on the one hand if we are really serious about our faith we must first take time and make a commitment to study our own faith. Then hone or sharpen our doctrinal knives against such materials. Just to discuss and debate over such controversial materials merely for curiosity's sake, or proofing one's 'ego' or intelligence would not be a healthy motive.
"Our jobs as parents and educators is primarily to educate our children or people rather than becoming full time bashers of anything non-Christian. God can defend himself, we dont need to defend him but we need to educate ourselves and those under our care concerning truth."
And:
"I think calling for boycott of the movie is either extreme and would not resolve the situation. (Because) then technically we should NOT watch any of the 'keng' movies like star wars, Lord of the Rings, Harry Potter, etc…
"Or even Romance movies that depict newly in love couples jumping into bed together after the first or second date."
Posted at 11:40 pm by alwynlau
 |  |  | Alwyn November 15, 2007 01:18 PM PST
nice piece of deconstruction, Alex...i particular like yr question about it being 'atheistic'...words like that are often used as (power-)labels to destroy credibility and generate negative hype. we should keep our eyes open for other words which connote more than they denote (e.g. 'relativistic', 'post-modern', 'syncretistic', etc.) |  |
  |  |  | Alex Tang November 15, 2007 12:19 AM PST
I really am suspicious about all this. I have read Pullman's Dark Materials trilogy when it come out some time ago and I remember I was not too impressed by the storyline. I believe the movie will be even more tamed down.
What makes me suspicious is when I was first forwarded the email a few months ago.
first, it was written in 'bad' English. I would have expected someone who have read Pullman's books to have better English because Pullman's writing is very much better than Rowling's
then, there was the matter of it being 'atheistic'. How do you define a movie as being 'atheistic'. Many movies especially those in the sword and sorcery genre are be considered 'atheistic' if you mean 'not-Christian'.
finally, I suspect it may be a marketing ploy by the movie makers to drum up hype about the <i>Golden Compass</i>. I may be wrong because I have no proof except what is before me. |  |
  |  |  | Alwyn November 12, 2007 04:22 PM PST
i too want to watch the movie, and no i don't think you will (or ought to) be 'bashed' for yr atheism (however tentatively held). There are many atheists who have lived lives of integrity and joy; and many Christians who've failed to show much of either (to themselves and others).
So no I don't think the 'label' matters as much as should a firm understanding of *why* we're adopting (for ourselves, for others) a particular label.
And, to be fair, we should consider the best of both labels i.e. let's think about some very commendable Christians and atheists, and reflect on what they've achieved for their communities, what next, why and why does it matter. (And of course, if the labels and beliefs don't matter, then why worry about adopting ANY label, right?)
What I feel is critical is an honest heart, willing to listen, to consider all the data/perspectives, to dialogue, to change. |  |
  |  |  | Derek L November 10, 2007 04:39 PM PST
And by the way, I want to watch that movie! Is this the part where I get bashed for being atheistic? Which I guess I am... kinda... |  |
  |  |  | Derek L November 10, 2007 04:38 PM PST
"...if we are really serious about our faith we must first take time and make a commitment to study our own faith. Then hone or sharpen our doctrinal knives against such materials."
Sounds very confrontational doesn't it? Makes me want to ask what is it about a different view point that needs to be opposed.
On the other hand, I really like this:
"God can defend himself, we dont need to defend him but we need to educate ourselves and those under our care concerning truth."
Definitions of "truth" aside, there's a certain integrity about being alright with whatever is true for you, and realizing that not everyone has a shared sense of truth (or even reality). |  |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|